Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

The Euro and SUT-RAS methods: some further considerations

  • The main objective of this paper is to revisit Temursho’s (2020) article “On the Euro method” in a critical and constructive way. We have praised part of his work and at the same time, we have analysed some of his arguments against the Euro method and against the work published by Valderas-Jaramillo et al. (2019). Moreover, we have analysed some other relevant aspects of the SUT-Euro and SUT-RAS methods not covered in Temursho (2020). Temursho (2020) seems to conclude that no one should use the Euro method again because of its limitations and drawbacks. However, although not being the Euro method perfect, we are afraid that there is still space for the use of the Euro method in updating/regionalizing supply and use tables.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Joerg BeutelORCiDGND, Juan Manuel Valderas-JaramilloORCiD, Jose Manuel Rueda-CantucheORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:kon4-opus4-28564
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2021.1883553
ISSN:1469-5758
ISSN:0953-5314
Parent Title (English):Economic Systems Research
Volume:Vol. 33
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
Place of publication:Routledge
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Publication:2021
Release Date:2021/10/09
Tag:Euro method; GRAS method; National Accounts; Non-survey techniques; Updating supply and use tables
Issue:No. 2
First Page:276
Last Page:286
Note:
Supplemental data available
Institutes:Fakultät Wirtschafts-, Kultur- und Rechtswissenschaften
Open Access?:Ja
Relevance:Peer reviewed Publikation in Master Journal List
Licence (English):License LogoLizenzbedingungen Taylor & Francis
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International