Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Article (7)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Blended values (1)
- Business Coaching (1)
- Business Plan (1)
- Business life-cycle (1)
- Business model (2)
- Business plan (4)
- Content analysis (2)
- Content analysis (keywords) (1)
- Early-stage technology venture (1)
- Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (2)
- Entrepreneurship (3)
- Female Entrepreneurship (1)
- Hybrid organizations (1)
- Literature Review (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Measurement methods (2)
- NTBF Survival (1)
- Network theory (1)
- New Technology-Based Firms (2)
- New technology-based firms (1)
- New venture survival (1)
- Outcome classification (1)
- Principal component analysis PCA (1)
- Randomized Controlled Trial (1)
- Resilience (1)
- Rough set theory RST (1)
- Social impact (1)
- Startups (1)
- Survival Capability (2)
- Systematic Literature Review (1)
- Tech ventures (1)
- Technology transfer (1)
- Text Analytics (1)
- Text Mining (1)
- Transaction Relations (2)
- Transaction relations (3)
- Value Network (3)
- Value network (1)
- Value-network strength (1)
- Venture creation (1)
- Venture emergence (2)
- Zombie firms (1)
The business plan is one of the most frequently available artifacts to innovation intermediaries of technology-based ventures' presentations in their early stages [1]–[4]. Agreement on the evaluations of venturing projects based on the business plans highly depends on the individual perspective of the readers [5], [6]. One reason is that little empirical proof exists for descriptions in business plans that suggest survival of early-stage technology ventures [7]–[9]. We identified descriptions of transaction relations [10]–[13] as an anchor of the snapshot model business plan to business reality [13]. In the early-stage, surviving ventures are building transaction relations to human resources, financial resources, and suppliers on the input side, and customers on the output side of the business towards a stronger ego-centric value network [10]–[13]. We conceptualized a multidimensional measurement instrument that evaluates the maturity of this ego-centric value networks based on the transaction relations of different strength levels that are described in business plans of early-stage technology ventures [13]. In this paper, the research design and the instrument are purified to achieve high agreement in the evaluation of business plans [14]–[16]. As a result, we present an overall research design that can reach acceptable quality for quantitative research. The paper so contributes to the literature on business analysis in the early-stage of technology-based ventures and the research technique of content analysis.
Regional economies clearly benefit from thriving entrepreneurial ecosystems. However, ecosystems are not yet entirely gender-inclusive and therefore are not tapping their full potential. This is most critical with respect to technology-based entrepreneurship which features the largest gender imbalance. Despite the considerably growing amount of literature in the two research fields of female entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems, the intersection of the two areas has not yet been outlined. We depict the state of knowledge with a structured review of the literature highlighting bibliometric information, methods used, and the main topics addressed in current articles. From there, recommendations for future research are derived.
Text produced by entrepreneurs represents a data source in entrepreneurship research on venture performance and fund-raising success. Manual text coding of single variables is increasingly assisted or replaced by computer-aided text analysis. Yet, for the development of prediction models with several variables, such dictionary-based text analysis methods are less suitable. Natural language processing techniques are an alternative; however, the implementation is more complex and requires substantial programming skills. More work is required to understand how text analytics can advance entrepreneurship research. This study hence experiments with different artificial intelligence methods rooted in Natural Language Processing and deep learning. It uses 766 business plans to train a model for the automated measurement of transaction relations, a construct which is an indicator for new technology-based firm survival. Empirical findings show that the accuracy of construct measurement can be significantly increased with automated methods and improves with larger amounts of training data. Language complexity sets limits to the precision of automated construct measurement though. We therefore recommend a hybrid approach: making use of the inherent advantages of combining automated with human coding until the amount of training data is sufficiently large to substitute the human coding completely. The study provides insights into the applicability of different text analytics methods in entrepreneurship research and points at future research potential.
What drives entrepreneurial action to create a lasting impact? The creation of new ventures that aim at having an impact beyond their financial performance face additional challenges: achieving economic sustainability and at the same time addressing social or environmental issues. Little is known on how these new hybrid organizations, aiming for multiple impact dimensions, manage to be congruent with their blended values. A dataset of 4,125 early-stage ventures is used to gain insights into how blended values are converted into financial, social and environmental impacts, giving shape to different types of hybrid organizations. Our findings suggest new hybrid organizations might opt to sacrifice financial impact to achieve social impact, yet this is not the case when they aim to generate environmental or sustainable impact. Therefore, the tensions and sacrifices related to holding blended values are not homogeneous across all types of new hybrid organizations.
Validity of the business model is a key indicator for buying into ventures in the early-stage. Business models of early-stage ventures decrease in validity when developing the business over the progressing stages of the business life-cycle. By doing so, the ventures are validating their business model when building transaction relationships to the surrounding value network. In prior research, we developed a research design based on existing business innovation proposals (onepager, pitch decks, business plans) that is assumed to evaluate the status of business model validation. The core hypothesis of the research design is that transaction relations represent a strong anchor between the business model and the business reality, thus providing information on the business model validity. In this research, we test this hypothesis by designing and analyzing a survey that was directed to founders taking part in a business plan competition. We compared the relationships described in the submitted business plans to the relations explicitely stated in the follow-up questionnaire. We identified that the described relations to customers, investors, and people (human resources) match the relationships expressed in questionnaires quite well. A significant disagreement, however, exists in the relationships to suppliers. We conclude that there is still a theoretical and empirical gap that leads to disagreement between business plans and reality in the group of suppliers.
The business model canvas (BMC) and the lean start-up manifesto (LSM) have been changing both the entrepreneurial education and, on the practical side, the mindset in setting up innovative ventures since the burst of the dot-com bubble. However, few empirical insights on the business model implementation patterns that distinguish between digital and non-digital innovative ventures exist. Connecting practical management tools to network theory as well as to the theory of organizational learning, this paper investigates evolution patterns of digital and non-digital business models out of the deal flow of an innovation intermediary. For this purpose, a multi-dimensional quantitative content analysis research design is applied to 242 ventures' business plans. The measured strength of transaction relations to customers, suppliers, people, and financiers has been combined with performance indicators of the sampled ventures. The results indicate that in order to succeed, digital ventures iterate their business on the market early and search for investment afterwards. Contrariwise, non-digital ventures already need financial investments in the early stages to set up a product ready to be tested on the market. In both groups we found strong evidence that specific evolutionary patterns relate to higher rates of success.
Evaluation of tech ventures’ evolving business models: rules for performance-related classification
(2022)
At the early stage of a successful tech venture's life cycle, it is assumed that the business model will evolve to higher quality over time. However, there are few empirical insights into business model evolution patterns for the performance-related classification of early-stage tech ventures. We created relevant variables evaluating the evolution of the venture-centric network and the technological proposition of both digital and non-digital ventures' business models using the text of submissions to the official business plan award in the German State of Baden-Württemberg between 2006 and 2012. Applying a principal component analysis/rough set theory mixed methodology, we explore performance-related business model classification rules in the heterogeneous sample of business plans. We find that ventures need to demonstrate real interactions with their customers' needs to survive. The distinguishing success rules are related to patent applications, risk capital, and scaling of the organisation. The rules help practitioners to classify business models in a way that allows them to prioritise action for performance.
Technologiebasierte Startups leisten einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur wirtschaftlichen sowie gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung. Im Zuge ihrer Gründung benötigen sie Unterstützung in Form von Risikokapital, das in der Seed- und Early-Stage primär durch Business Angels (BAs) bereitgestellt wird. Die Abläufe und Bewertungskriterien des BA Investmentprozesses sind bisher jedoch unzureichend erforscht. Der vorliegende Beitrag nutzt Experteninterviews im Rahmen einer Fallstudie des baden-württembergischen entrepreneurialen Ökosystems zur Identifikation des Vorgehens von BAs bei der Bewertung und Auswahl technologiebasierter Startups. Zudem werden die Kriterien, nach denen BAs vielversprechende von scheiternden Startups unterscheiden abgeleitet. Somit trägt der Beitrag zur Öffnung der „Black Box” von Investmentaktivitäten in den frühsten Gründungsphasen bei.