Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (5) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (5)
Keywords
- End-user computing (1)
- Enterprise architecture (1)
- IT governance (1)
- IT task responsibility (1)
- Shadow IT (2)
- Shadow IT systems (1)
- Transaction cost economics (1)
- Workarounds (1)
Organizations deploy a plethora of information technology (IT) systems. Various types of enterprise systems (ES) may coexist with the shadow IT systems (SITS) implemented by individual business units without the involvement of the IT department. The associated redundancy of SITS and ES suggests their integration. After integration, however, organization may find it challenging to retain the flexibility and innovation that the development of SITS offers the business. In this study, we conduct a literature review on IT systems integration. This review and the specific characteristics of SITS then serve to define SITS integration, derive guidelines for the integration decision, the phases preceding and following integration, and the integration process itself. SITS and ES integration can profit from existing knowledge of integration benefits, costs, and of the available technologies. Our study offers IT decision makers an insight into the specifics of SITS integration, and provides a basis for future SITS research.
Shadow information technology systems (SITS) coexist with formal enterprise systems in organisations. SITS pose risks but also increase flexibility of business units. Practice shows that SITS emerge, despite that Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) aims at controling all IT systems in an organization. Studies acknowledge this problem in general. However, they neither show the specific influencing areas of SITS nor provide approaches to address them. To close this gap, we use a literature review to analyse examples of practical SITS and their interference with EAM concerns. Thus, we find that they hinder especially transparency, reduction of EA complexity and governance. Research has focused on achieving transparency, governing the evolution of the EA but lacks strategies for reducing complexity. This study contributes to research and practice by uncovering the main influencing areas of SITS on EAM, as well as by laying a foundation for future research on this topic.
Das Thema Schatten-IT hat erst in den letzten Jahren in Wissenschaft und Praxis erheblich an Bedeutung gewonnen.1 Unter dem Begriff Schatten-IT werden dabei Systeme verstanden, welche die Fachbereiche in Eigenregie beschaffen oder erstellen und die nicht in das IT-Servicemanagement des Unternehmens eingebunden sind.2 Das Thema Schatten-IT ist dabei weder neu noch selten. Trotz dieser langen Geschichte war über die Verbreitung der Schatten-IT wenig Genaues bekannt. Im einem Beitrag in dieser Zeitschrift im Jahr 2011 haben wir die Risiken der Schatten-IT beschrieben und damit die Notwendigkeit für die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema Schatten-IT hergeleitet.3 Im Forschungsprojekt Schatten-IT des Konstanzer Instituts für Prozesssteuerung wurde dann in den vergangenen Jahren eine Methode zum Management der Schatten-IT entwickelt und in verschiedenen Fallstudien evaluiert. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, die empirischen Ergebnisse aus den Fallstudien vorzustellen.4 Die Datenbasis bilden dabei die Fallstudien in vier Unternehmen, in denen insgesamt 386 Schatten-IT Systeme gefunden wurden. Zwei der Unternehmen stammen aus der Finanz- und Versicherungsbranche, die beiden anderen aus der Fertigungsindustrie. Je ein Abteilungsbereich wurde für die Untersuchung herangezogen. Aus diesen Fallstudien stellt der Beitrag im zweiten Kapitel die Ausprägungen der aufgedeckten Schatten-IT vor. Im dritten Kapitel folgt dann die Beschreibung der geschäftlichen Relevanz der Schatten-IT. Im vierten Abschnitt gehen wir auf die Qualität der Schatten-IT Systeme ein. In der Fortsetzung des Artikels werden in einem weiteren Beitrag die möglichen Prüfungsansätze beschrieben.
Schatten-IT (Teil 2)
(2017)
In several organizations, business workgroups autonomously implement information technology (IT) outside the purview of the IT department. Shadow IT, evolving as a type of workaround from nontransparent and unapproved end-user computing (EUC), is a term used to refer to this phenomenon, which challenges norms relative to IT controllability. This report describes shadow IT based on case studies of three companies and investigates its management. In 62% of cases, companies decided to reengineer detected instances or reallocate related subtasks to their IT department. Considerations of risks and transaction cost economics with regard to specificity, uncertainty, and scope explain these actions and the resulting coordination of IT responsibilities between the business workgroups and IT departments. This turns shadow IT into controlled business-managed IT activities and enhances EUC management. The results contribute to the governance of IT task responsibilities and provide a way to formalize the role of workarounds in business workgroups.