Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (17)
- Other Publications (2)
- Article (1)
The corrosion resistance of stainless steels is massively influenced by the condition of their surface. The surface quality includes the topography of the surface, the structure and composition of the passive layer, and the surface near structure of the base material. These factors are influenced by final physical/chemical surface treatments. The presented work shows significantly lower corrosion resistance for mechanical machined specimens than for etched specimens. It also turns out that the rougher the surface, the lower the corrosion resistance gets. However, there is no general finding which shows if blasted or grinded surfaces are more appropriate, but a dependency on process parameters and the characteristics on corrosive exposure in terms of corrosion behavior. The results show that not only the surface roughness Ra has an influence on corrosion behavior but also the shape of peaks and valleys which are evolved by surface treatments. Imperfections in the base material, like sulfidic inclusions lead to a weaker passive layer, respectively, to a decrease of the corrosion resistance. By using special passivating techniques the corrosion resistance of stainless steels can be increased to a higher level in comparison to common passivation.
Einfluss der Oberfläche
(2018)
The electrochemical behavior for different surface conditions and different degrees of deformation of metastable austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 UNS S30400 were studied using critical pitting potential and electrochemical noise measurements. The influence on corrosion resistance by using different abrasives (silicon carbide and corundum) for surface finish by grinding is illustrated. For the characterization of local defects and surface topography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and tactile measurements were used. An inverse correlation between occurrence of local defects on the surface and critical pitting potential was found by using image processing. Therefore, gray scale values of different surfaces were compared. The influence of mass content of α'-martensite on the corrosion resistance is shown by comparing different qualities of surface finish. For smooth machined surfaces it can be shown that an increasing numbers of strain induced martensite is decreasing the corrosion resistance lightly. For low abrasive machining an inverse correlation between the critical pitting potential and surface roughness is given. However, for higher abrasive machining parameters, this correlation could not be found.
Durch Beanspruchungen bei der Fertigung oder in der Anwendung können metastabile austenitische Stähle eine Phasenumwandlung von ?- Austenit zu ?‘-Martensit durchlaufen. Verbunden damit sind Eigenschaftsänderungen, welche sich signifikant auf das Werkstoffverhalten unter mechanischer, tribologischer oder korrosiver Belastung auswirken können.
Um möglichen negativen Auswirkungen wie ungewollte Magnetisierbarkeit oder Beeinflussung von Fertigungsparameter sowie Korrosionseigenschaften zu unterbinden muss die martensitische Phase zunächst erfasst und quantifiziert werden.
Für diese Aufgabe stehen neben den bekannten und kostenintensiven Verfahren wie EBSD und XRD für die praxisnahe Anwendung das magneto-induktive Messverfahren und verschiedene Ätzmethoden zur Verfügung.
Anhand von Applikationen aus Anwendung, Fertigung und Forschung werden die Wirkweisen, Vorteile und Grenzen verschiedener Ätzverfahren und dem magneto-induktiv messenden FERITSCOPE® MP30 aufgezeigt. Ebenso werden ergänzende Methoden bzw. Techniken zur Validation der Verfahren diskutiert und erläutert.
Poster
