Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (26)
- Article (5)
- Other Publications (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (35)
Keywords
- Abrasive grain material (1)
- Anhaftung (1)
- Aquaculture (1)
- Behälterbau (1)
- Corrosion Resistance (1)
- Duplex stainless steel (1)
- Edelstahl Rostfrei (1)
- Expanded austenite layer (1)
- Fish farming (1)
- Geological protection (1)
The corrosion resistance of stainless steels is massively influenced by the condition of their surface. The surface quality includes the topography of the surface, the structure and composition of the passive layer, and the surface near structure of the base material. These factors are influenced by final physical/chemical surface treatments. The presented work shows significantly lower corrosion resistance for mechanical machined specimens than for etched specimens. It also turns out that the rougher the surface, the lower the corrosion resistance gets. However, there is no general finding which shows if blasted or grinded surfaces are more appropriate, but a dependency on process parameters and the characteristics on corrosive exposure in terms of corrosion behavior. The results show that not only the surface roughness Ra has an influence on corrosion behavior but also the shape of peaks and valleys which are evolved by surface treatments. Imperfections in the base material, like sulfidic inclusions lead to a weaker passive layer, respectively, to a decrease of the corrosion resistance. By using special passivating techniques the corrosion resistance of stainless steels can be increased to a higher level in comparison to common passivation.
This paper compares the surface morphology of differently finished austenitic stainless steel AISI 316L, also in combination with low temperature carburization. Milled and tumbled surfaces were analyzed by means of corrosion resistance and surface morphology. The results of potentiodynamic measurements show that professional grinding operations with SiC and Al2O3 always lead to a better corrosion resistance of low temperature carburized surfaces compared to the untreated reference in the used acidified chloride solution. Big influence on the corrosion resistance of vibratory ground or tumbled surfaces has the amount of plastic deformation while machining, that has to be kept low for austenitic stainless steels. Due to the high ductility, plastic deformation can lead to the formation of meta stable pits that can be initiation points of corrosion. The formation of meta stable pits can be aggravated by low temperature diffusion processes.
Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) allows the production of complex components geometry. Generally, a high quality of the components is achieved due to the well managed composition of the metal powder and the non-isotropic properties. If a duplex stainless steel is produced, a heat treatment after the HIP-process is necessary to remove precipitations like carbides, nitrides and intermetallic phases. In a new process, the sintering step should be combined with the heat treatment. In this case a high cooling rate is necessary to avoid precipitations in duplex stainless steels. In this work, the influence of the HIP-temperature and the wall thickness on corrosion resistance, microstructure and impact strength were investigated. The results should help to optimize the process parameters like temperature and cooling rate. For the investigation, two HIP-temperatures were tested in a classical HIP-process step with a defined cooling rate. An additional heat treatment was not conducted. The specimens were cut from different sectors of the HIP-block. For investigation of the corrosion resistance, the critical pitting temperature was determined with electrochemical method according to EN ISO 17864. An impact test was used to determine the impact transition temperature. Metallographic investigations show the microstructure in the different sectors of the HIP-block.
The electrochemical behavior for different surface conditions and different degrees of deformation of metastable austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 UNS S30400 were studied using critical pitting potential and electrochemical noise measurements. The influence on corrosion resistance by using different abrasives (silicon carbide and corundum) for surface finish by grinding is illustrated. For the characterization of local defects and surface topography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and tactile measurements were used. An inverse correlation between occurrence of local defects on the surface and critical pitting potential was found by using image processing. Therefore, gray scale values of different surfaces were compared. The influence of mass content of α'-martensite on the corrosion resistance is shown by comparing different qualities of surface finish. For smooth machined surfaces it can be shown that an increasing numbers of strain induced martensite is decreasing the corrosion resistance lightly. For low abrasive machining an inverse correlation between the critical pitting potential and surface roughness is given. However, for higher abrasive machining parameters, this correlation could not be found.
Durch Beanspruchungen bei der Fertigung oder in der Anwendung können metastabile austenitische Stähle eine Phasenumwandlung von ?- Austenit zu ?‘-Martensit durchlaufen. Verbunden damit sind Eigenschaftsänderungen, welche sich signifikant auf das Werkstoffverhalten unter mechanischer, tribologischer oder korrosiver Belastung auswirken können.
Um möglichen negativen Auswirkungen wie ungewollte Magnetisierbarkeit oder Beeinflussung von Fertigungsparameter sowie Korrosionseigenschaften zu unterbinden muss die martensitische Phase zunächst erfasst und quantifiziert werden.
Für diese Aufgabe stehen neben den bekannten und kostenintensiven Verfahren wie EBSD und XRD für die praxisnahe Anwendung das magneto-induktive Messverfahren und verschiedene Ätzmethoden zur Verfügung.
Anhand von Applikationen aus Anwendung, Fertigung und Forschung werden die Wirkweisen, Vorteile und Grenzen verschiedener Ätzverfahren und dem magneto-induktiv messenden FERITSCOPE® MP30 aufgezeigt. Ebenso werden ergänzende Methoden bzw. Techniken zur Validation der Verfahren diskutiert und erläutert.
